hi
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:52 pm
hi
how yall doing?
how yall doing?
You're back =D
I promise be kind (more) this time! =D
Page 1 of 3
Re: hi
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 1:49 am
Re: hi
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:50 am
oh hello again 
please don't take things too seriously here.
please don't take things too seriously here.
Re: hi
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:10 pm
hello!
haven't seen you around in a while...
haven't seen you around in a while...
Re: hi
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:34 pm
Hi.
Re: hi
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:09 pm
Hi
Re: hi
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:57 am
Hello...
Welcome back...
Welcome back...
Re: hi
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:49 pm
how come i say no hi before???
Re: hi
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:00 pm
Why are girls evil all of a sudden?
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:21 am
cuz. math will answer ur question, and this:
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:54 am
no.
faults:
1. why does require mean multiply? shouldn't it be addition?
therefore girls = 2 * money = 2*root of evil
2. evil is bad so it's negative so it can't have a root ie does not exist
therefore root of evil does not exist so girls do not exist.
faults:
1. why does require mean multiply? shouldn't it be addition?
therefore girls = 2 * money = 2*root of evil
2. evil is bad so it's negative so it can't have a root ie does not exist
therefore root of evil does not exist so girls do not exist.
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:55 am
... then why am i here?
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 2:34 am
That's Vraiment's Theorembookgeek98 wrote:cuz. math will answer ur question, and this:
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 2:40 pm
a totally untrue theorem.
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:10 pm
are you sure?
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 4:04 pm
no, that's is the theorem of which some random guy came up with and passed it on to our beloved internet
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:03 pm
but it's not wrong it's like Pythagoras theorem
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:14 pm
That's also wrong...
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:51 pm
everything's wrong. including this statement.
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:56 pm
OH NO!