Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:48 pm
NO ewoks are not bigger than darth vader!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
*Force Choke*
*Force Choke*
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:40 pm
*blows up death star*
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:53 pm
*bites death star*
mmmm. *chews*
mmmm. *chews*
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:46 pm
I don't care about the Death Star I have the Sun Cusher now.
(If you don't know what that is read the jedi academy triology.)
(If you don't know what that is read the jedi academy triology.)
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:05 pm
You're eating metal chunks? I want some! In a salad.atomtengeralattjaro wrote:*bites death star*
mmmm. *chews*
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:29 am
in a sad lad?
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:27 am
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:38 pm
is that a real bunny?
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:57 pm
Sure, but it's the best with ice cream.Doctor What wrote:You're eating metal chunks? I want some! In a salad.atomtengeralattjaro wrote:*bites death star*
mmmm. *chews*
No, it's a crying one.JKL;!!!!! wrote:is that a real bunny?
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:48 pm
is that a real crying bunny?
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:40 pm
Have you ever seen anybody really cry?!... I don't think so!...
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:30 pm
CX gamer wrote:Have you ever seen any bunny really cry?!... I don't think so!...
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:37 pm
Wow.Doctor What wrote:You've never heard of the cute little penguin, Tux?
That penguin has some serious Ab-flab goin' on there...
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:38 pm
*slap* Don't mess with Tux!
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:40 pm
Don't slap me!
Sure, he may look cute now,
But when he gets you alone...
o.o"""
Sure, he may look cute now,
But when he gets you alone...
o.o"""
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:36 pm
hands up!
^O.o^
^O.o^
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:00 pm
Don't shoot!
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:38 am
Bend over!
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:05 pm
Hmm.. This topic has become somewhat... off topic. So I'm gonna briefly bring us back to where we started.
Windows:
This is obviously the most widely used operating around the world, mainly because of it's "user friendly" atmosphere. However, since all tasks are highly automated it takes away from the ability of the user to learn about the functions of the OS and exactly how it works. It is also the least stable choice and buggier than any other OS out there. The only plus sides to the system are the easy-to-navigate GUI and high compatibility ratio.
Mac OS X:
Being the second most popular OS to date (and the first to introduce a all-graphical UI and shell, making it far ahead of its time) it has held a high reputation in the face of Windows' sweep across the globe. Mac OS is designed for compatibility with only Mac OS-specific hardware, making it pretty much the most solid and stable operating system around. It (like Windows) also has a fairly high ratio of compatibility due to its widespread use. The only drawback is because since the OS depends on OS-specific hardware, long-term maintenance can yield relatively high costs.
Note: It has been recently proved Mac OS X Leopard is LESS secure than Windows Vista by means of a zero-day exploit discovered at a hacking convention in Vancouver a few weeks ago. Who saw that one coming?
Linux:
The Linux philosophy pushes for freedom and flexibility in a fast-paced technological era. There are literally HUNDREDS of different Linux distributions, giving users the ability to quench their thirst when it comes to any computing need. Also, each distribution is highly configurable, giving the user complete control over their system. Even better, all Linux distributions and software are completely free and open source (meaning the public can alter software at their discretion under the GNU license). The only drawback is that it yields the lowest amount of compatibility in comparison to the two corporate front-runners mentioned above. However, this is being changed drastically (ex. OpenOffice is an open source alternative to the Microsoft Office suite that can create and open formats used by any MS Office application) each and everyday as new advances are made towards cross-platform compatibility. Aside from this, it is the most secure and arguably the most stable operating system available.
So who wins?
My vote goes for Linux. It shows the most respect for its users by remaining completely free of charge and being highly customizable to individual needs. On compatibility issues: Most of them can be fixed with a little work from the user! This isn't necessarily a bad thing since it gives the user a feel of how exactly the operating system works.
Seriously, what more could you ask for?
Windows:
This is obviously the most widely used operating around the world, mainly because of it's "user friendly" atmosphere. However, since all tasks are highly automated it takes away from the ability of the user to learn about the functions of the OS and exactly how it works. It is also the least stable choice and buggier than any other OS out there. The only plus sides to the system are the easy-to-navigate GUI and high compatibility ratio.
Mac OS X:
Being the second most popular OS to date (and the first to introduce a all-graphical UI and shell, making it far ahead of its time) it has held a high reputation in the face of Windows' sweep across the globe. Mac OS is designed for compatibility with only Mac OS-specific hardware, making it pretty much the most solid and stable operating system around. It (like Windows) also has a fairly high ratio of compatibility due to its widespread use. The only drawback is because since the OS depends on OS-specific hardware, long-term maintenance can yield relatively high costs.
Note: It has been recently proved Mac OS X Leopard is LESS secure than Windows Vista by means of a zero-day exploit discovered at a hacking convention in Vancouver a few weeks ago. Who saw that one coming?
Linux:
The Linux philosophy pushes for freedom and flexibility in a fast-paced technological era. There are literally HUNDREDS of different Linux distributions, giving users the ability to quench their thirst when it comes to any computing need. Also, each distribution is highly configurable, giving the user complete control over their system. Even better, all Linux distributions and software are completely free and open source (meaning the public can alter software at their discretion under the GNU license). The only drawback is that it yields the lowest amount of compatibility in comparison to the two corporate front-runners mentioned above. However, this is being changed drastically (ex. OpenOffice is an open source alternative to the Microsoft Office suite that can create and open formats used by any MS Office application) each and everyday as new advances are made towards cross-platform compatibility. Aside from this, it is the most secure and arguably the most stable operating system available.
So who wins?
My vote goes for Linux. It shows the most respect for its users by remaining completely free of charge and being highly customizable to individual needs. On compatibility issues: Most of them can be fixed with a little work from the user! This isn't necessarily a bad thing since it gives the user a feel of how exactly the operating system works.
Seriously, what more could you ask for?
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:23 pm
Commodore 64. With a spacious 64 KB of memory, what more could you ask for?Fate Reconciled wrote: So who wins?